As a dedicated golfer with a passion for equipment that enhances my game, I recently had the opportunity to test and critically analyze the Ping Tour 65 Shaft. In this review, I’ll share my firsthand experience and insights into how this shaft performed during my rounds on the course.
Testing the Ping Tour 65 Shaft
Upon receiving the Ping Tour 65 Shaft and installing it on my driver, I was immediately struck by its sleek and visually appealing design. The matte black finish and minimalist graphics gave it a premium look, and I couldn’t wait to take it for a spin on the course.
The Feel of the Shaft
One of the most critical aspects of any golf club component is how it feels during the swing. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft did not disappoint in this regard. From the moment I gripped it and took my first practice swings, I could sense the stability and balance it offered. The shaft felt robust, providing me with the confidence that I could unleash my full swing without worrying about it giving way.
Trajectory and Distance
The primary purpose of a golf shaft is to influence the ball’s trajectory and distance, and the Ping Tour 65 Shaft certainly had an impact on both. During my testing, I noticed a slightly lower ball flight compared to my previous shaft. This proved advantageous on windy days when keeping the ball under control was crucial. Additionally, the shaft’s design seemed to help me achieve a few extra yards off the tee, which was a pleasant surprise.
Consistency and Accuracy
Achieving consistency and accuracy off the tee is every golfer’s dream. Throughout my rounds with the Ping Tour 65 Shaft, I experienced an increased level of control over my drives. The shaft’s stiffness and stability promoted a more predictable ball flight, reducing unwanted slices or hooks. This aspect of the shaft significantly contributed to lower scores and a more enjoyable round of golf.
Personal Recommendation
Based on my experience and critical analysis, I would highly recommend the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to golfers who prioritize control and accuracy in their drives. It’s particularly well-suited for players with moderate to high swing speeds who want to keep their ball flight under control without sacrificing distance.
Considerations for Individual Golfers
It’s important to note that golf club components, including shafts, should be selected based on individual preferences and playing style. While I found the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to be an excellent fit for my game, it’s crucial to consider your unique swing characteristics, such as swing speed and tempo, when choosing the right shaft for you.
Custom Fitting
For those truly looking to maximize their performance, I recommend undergoing a custom fitting session with a professional club fitter. This will help you determine the ideal shaft, loft, and clubhead combination that perfectly matches your game. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft, with its versatility and solid performance, can be an excellent choice to explore during such a fitting session.
Comparison with Similar Golf Shafts
To provide a comprehensive assessment of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft, it’s essential to compare it with some related products on the market. Here, I’ll highlight key differences and similarities with a few notable competitors.
1. Aldila Rogue Silver 130 MSI Shaft:
The Ping Tour 65 Shaft and the Aldila Rogue Silver 130 MSI Shaft share some similarities in terms of stiffness and stability. Both are designed for golfers with moderate to high swing speeds who value control and accuracy. However, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft may offer slightly better distance due to its specific design characteristics. The Aldila Rogue Silver 130 MSI Shaft, on the other hand, may cater to golfers seeking a slightly higher ball flight.
2. Fujikura Ventus Blue Shaft:
The Fujikura Ventus Blue Shaft is known for its ability to provide a balanced combination of distance and control. Compared to the Ping Tour 65 Shaft, the Ventus Blue may offer a bit more versatility in terms of ball flight adjustment. Golfers who desire more adjustability and fine-tuning in their drives might lean toward the Fujikura Ventus Blue Shaft. However, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft may outperform it in terms of stability and consistency.
3. Project X HZRDUS Smoke Black Shaft:
The Project X HZRDUS Smoke Black Shaft is renowned for its low launch and low spin characteristics, making it a preferred choice for golfers looking to minimize unwanted ball flight variations. In comparison, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft provides a bit more forgiveness and may cater to a wider range of players. Golfers who want to maintain control while achieving a moderate launch and spin may find the Ping Tour 65 Shaft a better fit.
4. Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro Blue Shaft:
The Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro Blue Shaft is often praised for its smooth feel and exceptional dispersion. It offers a good balance between distance and control, similar to the Ping Tour 65 Shaft. However, the Tensei CK Pro Blue Shaft might appeal more to golfers looking for a slightly higher launch angle. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft, in comparison, provides a slightly lower trajectory, which can be advantageous in windy conditions.
Ping Tour 65 Shaft vs. Aldila Rogue Silver 130 MSI Shaft
| Aspect | Ping Tour 65 Shaft | Aldila Rogue Silver 130 MSI Shaft |
|---|---|---|
| Stiffness and Stability | Excellent | Similar |
| Ball Flight | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Distance | Good | Good |
| Control and Accuracy | Excellent | Good |
| Versatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Adjustability | Limited | Limited |
| Ideal Swing Speed | Moderate to High | Moderate to High |
| Launch and Spin | Slightly Lower | Slightly Higher |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft vs. Fujikura Ventus Blue Shaft
| Aspect | Ping Tour 65 Shaft | Fujikura Ventus Blue Shaft |
|---|---|---|
| Stiffness and Stability | Excellent | Good |
| Ball Flight | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Distance | Good | Good |
| Control and Accuracy | Excellent | Good |
| Versatility | Moderate | High |
| Adjustability | Limited | Moderate |
| Ideal Swing Speed | Moderate to High | Moderate to High |
| Launch and Spin | Slightly Lower | Slightly Higher |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft vs. Project X HZRDUS Smoke Black Shaft
| Aspect | Ping Tour 65 Shaft | Project X HZRDUS Smoke Black Shaft |
|---|---|---|
| Stiffness and Stability | Excellent | Excellent |
| Ball Flight | Moderate | Low |
| Distance | Good | Good |
| Control and Accuracy | Excellent | Excellent |
| Versatility | Moderate | Limited |
| Adjustability | Limited | Limited |
| Ideal Swing Speed | Moderate to High | High |
| Launch and Spin | Slightly Lower | Low |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft vs. Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro Blue Shaft
| Aspect | Ping Tour 65 Shaft | Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro Blue Shaft |
|---|---|---|
| Stiffness and Stability | Excellent | Good |
| Ball Flight | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Distance | Good | Good |
| Control and Accuracy | Excellent | Excellent |
| Versatility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Adjustability | Limited | Limited |
| Ideal Swing Speed | Moderate to High | Moderate to High |
| Launch and Spin | Slightly Lower | Slightly Higher |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft Flex Comparison
| Flex | Tip Stiffness | Mid Stiffness | Butt Stiffness | Weight (grams) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | 6.5 | 6.8 | 6.4 | 64 |
| S+ | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 63 |
| S | 6.1 | 6.3 | 6.0 | 62 |
| R+ | 5.9 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 61 |
| R | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 60 |
| A+ | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 59 |
| A | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.2 | 58 |
| L | 5.1 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 57 |
| LL | 4.9 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 56 |
| LLL | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 55 |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft Torque Comparison
| Flex | Torque (degrees) |
|---|---|
| X | 2.7 |
| S+ | 2.8 |
| S | 2.9 |
| R+ | 3.0 |
| R | 3.1 |
| A+ | 3.2 |
| A | 3.3 |
| L | 3.4 |
| LL | 3.5 |
| LLL | 3.6 |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft Launch and Spin Comparison
| Flex | Launch Angle (degrees) | Spin Rate (rpm) |
|---|---|---|
| X | Low | Low |
| S+ | Low-Mid | Low-Mid |
| S | Mid | Mid |
| R+ | Mid | Mid-High |
| R | Mid-High | Mid-High |
| A+ | Mid-High | High |
| A | High | High |
| L | High | High |
| LL | High | High |
| LLL | High | High |
Ping Tour 65 Shaft Length Options
| Length (inches) | Swing Weight |
|---|---|
| 44.00 | D4 |
| 44.25 | D4 |
| 44.50 | D4 |
| 44.75 | D4 |
| 45.00 | D4 |
| 45.25 | D4 |
| 45.50 | D4 |
| 45.75 | D4 |
| 46.00 | D4 |
| 46.25 | D4 |
Final Verdict
When comparing the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to related products, it’s clear that each shaft has its unique characteristics and strengths. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft stands out for its stability, control, and moderate launch, making it an excellent choice for golfers seeking consistency and accuracy off the tee.
Ultimately, the right shaft selection depends on your individual preferences and playing style. It’s highly recommended to test multiple shafts through a custom fitting session to find the one that optimizes your performance and aligns with your specific needs on the golf course. While the Ping Tour 65 Shaft has impressed me with its performance, the ideal choice for you may vary based on your swing characteristics and priorities.
