Golf is a sport that requires skill, precision, and the right equipment to play well. When it comes to selecting the perfect club for your game, there are many options to choose from. In this article, we’ll compare two popular golf clubs: the Titleist sub 70 699 and the TaylorMade p790.
Introduction to Sub 70 699 and P790
The Sub 70 699 is a classic-looking iron that is designed to deliver excellent performance on the golf course. It is a traditional cavity-back iron that has a thin topline, minimal offset, and a compact shape that appeals to skilled golfers.
On the other hand, the TaylorMade P790 is a popular game improvement iron that is designed to help golfers achieve more distance and accuracy on their shots. It has a hollow body design with a thin face that delivers impressive ball speed and forgiveness.
Design and Construction
The Sub 70 699 features a forged construction with a 1025 carbon steel body and a thin 455 carpenter steel face. The combination of these materials provides a soft feel at impact while delivering high ball speed and distance. The iron has a traditional cavity-back design that promotes consistent ball flight and control.
The TaylorMade P790, on the other hand, features a hollow body design that is filled with a lightweight foam material to enhance feel and sound. The iron has a forged face made from 4140 carbon steel that is wrapped around a soft 8620 carbon steel body. The design of the P790 promotes high launch and increased ball speed for maximum distance.
Performance and Playability
The Sub 70 699 is designed for golfers who prioritize precision and control over distance. It has a traditional blade-like shape that appeals to skilled players who prefer a classic look. The iron has a relatively narrow sole that allows golfers to make clean contact with the ball and work shots with ease.
The TaylorMade P790, on the other hand, is designed for golfers who want to maximize distance and forgiveness. The iron has a larger profile and a wider sole that promotes easy launch and a high ball flight. The P790 also has a lower center of gravity that helps golfers achieve a higher launch angle and increased carry distance.
Comparison in Terms of Forgiveness
The Sub 70 699 offers a moderate level of forgiveness, making it suitable for golfers who have consistent ball-striking skills. The iron has a classic cavity-back design that provides some forgiveness on off-center hits, but it’s not as forgiving as some other game improvement irons.
On the other hand, the TaylorMade P790 is known for its high level of forgiveness. The hollow body design and the use of lightweight foam material allow the iron to have a larger sweet spot, making it easier for golfers to achieve consistent distance and accuracy on their shots.
Comparison in Terms of Sound and Feel
The Sub 70 699 has a soft feel at impact that is preferred by many skilled golfers. The combination of carbon steel and a thin face allows for excellent feedback on shots, giving golfers a clear sense of where they made contact with the ball. The sound produced by the Sub 70 699 is also crisp and clean, providing a satisfying experience for golfers.
The TaylorMade P790 also has a soft feel at impact, thanks to the use of foam material inside the hollow body design. The foam material reduces unwanted vibrations, giving golfers a smoother feel on their shots. The sound produced by the P790 is also muted, which some golfers may find less satisfying than the crisp sound of the Sub 70 699.
Price Comparison
The Sub 70 699 is a relatively affordable option compared to other high-end irons on the market. The price of a set of Sub 70 699 irons is around $600, making it a cost-effective option for golfers who want a high-performing iron without breaking the bank.
The TaylorMade P790, on the other hand, is a premium iron that comes with a premium price tag. The cost of a set of P790 irons is around $1,400, making it a more expensive option than the Sub 70 699. However, the P790 does offer more advanced technology and a higher level of forgiveness, which may justify the higher price for some golfers.
Comparison in Terms of Distance
The Sub 70 699 is designed to offer consistent distance with every shot, but it is not marketed as a distance iron. The club’s design is focused on precision and control rather than maximizing distance. The thin face and cavity-back design do allow for some additional ball speed and distance, but it’s not as significant as some other game improvement irons.
The TaylorMade P790 is known for its distance capabilities. The hollow body design and thin face create a high level of ball speed, which translates to increased distance on shots. The club’s design is optimized for distance, making it an excellent choice for golfers who want to add yards to their game.
Comparison in Terms of Customization
Both the Sub 70 699 and the TaylorMade P790 offer customization options to help golfers optimize their clubs for their game. The Sub 70 699 allows golfers to choose from a variety of shaft options, including steel and graphite, as well as different flexes and weights. Golfers can also choose to add custom grips to their clubs.
The TaylorMade P790 also offers customization options for shafts and grips, but it goes a step further by offering a variety of loft and lie angle options. This level of customization allows golfers to tailor their clubs to their specific swing characteristics, which can lead to improved performance on the course.
Sub 70 699 Irons Specifications
| Model | Loft | Lie | Length | Swing Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Iron | 20° | 60° | 39.5″ | D2 |
| 4 Iron | 22° | 60.5° | 39″ | D2 |
| 5 Iron | 25° | 61° | 38.5″ | D2 |
| 6 Iron | 28° | 61.5° | 38″ | D2 |
| 7 Iron | 32° | 62° | 37.5″ | D2 |
| 8 Iron | 36° | 62.5° | 37″ | D2 |
| 9 Iron | 40° | 63° | 36.5″ | D2 |
| PW | 45° | 63.5° | 36″ | D2 |
| GW | 50° | 64° | 35.75″ | D2 |
| SW | 55° | 64° | 35.5″ | D3 |
P790 Irons Specifications
| Model | Loft | Lie | Length | Swing Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Iron | 19° | 60.5° | 39″ | D2 |
| 4 Iron | 21.5° | 61° | 38.5″ | D2 |
| 5 Iron | 24° | 61.5° | 38″ | D2 |
| 6 Iron | 27° | 62° | 37.5″ | D2 |
| 7 Iron | 30.5° | 62.5° | 37″ | D2 |
| 8 Iron | 35° | 63° | 36.5″ | D2 |
| 9 Iron | 40° | 63.5° | 36″ | D2 |
| PW | 45° | 64° | 35.75″ | D3 |
| AW | 50° | 64° | 35.5″ | D3 |
| GW | 55° | 64° | 35.25″ | D3 |
Sub 70 699 vs P790 Comparison
| Model | Sub 70 699 | P790 |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| 4 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| 5 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| 6 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| 7 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| 8 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| 9 Iron | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| PW | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| AW | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
| GW | Low profile head, tungsten weighting, wide sole | Hollow construction, speed foam, tungsten weighting |
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Sub 70 699 and the TaylorMade P790 are both excellent golf clubs that offer different benefits to golfers. The Sub 70 699 is a classic-looking iron that prioritizes precision and control, while the TaylorMade P790 is a game improvement iron that maximizes distance and forgiveness.
Ultimately, the choice between these two clubs will depend on your individual needs and preferences. It’s important to consider factors such as forgiveness, sound and feel, and price when making a decision. Testing both clubs on the course or at a fitting center can help you determine which one is the best fit for your game.
Author
- by
