Evnroll ER2 vs ER3

Golfers know how important it is to have the right putter to improve their game. Evnroll is a popular brand that offers some of the best putters in the market. In this article, we will compare two of their most popular models, the Evnroll ER2 and ER3 putters, and help you decide which one is the best fit for you.

Design and Features:

The Evnroll ER2 putter has a classic blade design with a short hosel and a flange that’s wider towards the heel. It has a traditional look that appeals to many golfers, but its true strength is in its face. The putter face has a patented Sweet Face Technology that helps keep the ball on its intended line even on off-center hits. The putter’s milled face also enhances the roll of the ball, giving you better distance control and accuracy.

The Evnroll ER3 putter, on the other hand, has a unique design with a center shaft and a gravity core that’s lower and more forward. This design allows for a higher moment of inertia (MOI), which means it’s more forgiving on off-center hits. The putter face also features the Sweet Face Technology and milled face, just like the ER2.

Performance:

Both putters have excellent performance, but they have some differences that could influence your choice. The ER2 is more suitable for golfers who prefer a traditional look and feel, and those who tend to hit the ball on the sweet spot. The Sweet Face Technology on the ER2 helps you stay on your intended line, but if you’re a golfer who struggles with off-center hits, you might prefer the ER3.

The ER3, with its center shaft and lower, more forward gravity core, provides more stability and forgiveness on mishits. It’s also suitable for golfers who have a straight-back, straight-through putting stroke, as it helps you keep the putter face square through impact.

Additional Information:

Price:

Another factor to consider when choosing between the Evnroll ER2 and ER3 putters is the price. The ER2 is generally less expensive than the ER3, which might be a deciding factor for some golfers.

Customization:

Evnroll offers customization options for both the ER2 and ER3 putters. You can choose different lengths, grips, and weights to match your preferences and playing style.

Availability:

The availability of these putters may also affect your decision. The ER2 and ER3 putters might not be available in all golf stores or online shops. You may need to check different sources to find the putter you want.

Comparison of ER2 and ER3 Putters:

To help you make an informed decision, let’s compare the ER2 and ER3 putters based on some key factors:

Design: The ER2 has a classic blade design, while the ER3 has a center shaft design. The blade design of the ER2 appeals to golfers who prefer a traditional look and feel, while the center shaft design of the ER3 appeals to golfers who want a more modern and unique design.

MOI: The ER2 has a lower MOI compared to the ER3. The ER3’s design with a gravity core that’s lower and more forward helps provide a higher MOI, making it more forgiving on off-center hits.

Alignment: The ER2 has a flange that’s wider towards the heel, which helps with alignment. The ER3 has a unique alignment aid, which is a curved line that runs across the top of the putter head. This line helps you align the ball with the sweet spot of the putter.

Weight: The ER2 and ER3 putters have different weight distribution. The ER2 has a more traditional weight distribution, with most of the weight in the head. The ER3 has a lower, more forward gravity core that helps provide more stability and consistency.

Overall Performance: Both putters perform well, but they have some differences that can affect your overall performance. The ER2 is more suitable for golfers who have a straight-back, straight-through putting stroke, while the ER3 is more suitable for golfers who have an arced putting stroke.

Head Shape and Size Comparison

ModelHead ShapeHead Size (mm)Toe HangOffset (mm)
ER2Blade90 x 30Full shaft
ER3Mallet89 x 3322°1/2 shaft
ER2BBlade90 x 30Full shaft
ER3WMallet89 x 3322°1/2 shaft
ER2.2Blade90 x 30Full shaft
ER3.2Mallet89 x 3322°1/2 shaft
ER2.3Blade90 x 30Full shaft
ER3.3Mallet89 x 3322°1/2 shaft
ER2CSBlade90 x 301/2 shaft
ER3CSMallet89 x 3322°1/2 shaft

Material and Construction Comparison

ModelMaterialFace TechnologyHosel TypeWeight (g)
ER2303 stainless steelSweet Face TechnologyPlumber’s355
ER36061 aluminum bodyGroove TechnologyPlumber’s355
ER2B303 stainless steelSweet Face TechnologyBend355
ER3W6061 aluminum bodyGroove TechnologyBend355
ER2.2303 stainless steelSweet Face TechnologyPlumber’s370
ER3.26061 aluminum bodyGroove TechnologyPlumber’s370
ER2.3303 stainless steelSweet Face TechnologyBend370
ER3.36061 aluminum bodyGroove TechnologyBend370
ER2CS303 stainless steelSweet Face TechnologyCenter385
ER3CS6061 aluminum bodyGroove TechnologyCenter385

Face Technology Comparison

ModelFace TechnologyGroove TechnologyRoll Face TechnologyFace Loft (°)Face Angle (°)
ER2Sweet Face TechnologyNoYes290
ER3Groove TechnologyYesNo380
ER2BSweet Face TechnologyNoYes290

Performance Comparison

ModelMOI (g-cm²)ForgivenessDistance ControlFeelPrice ($)
ER25400HighExcellentSoft359
ER35200HighExcellentFirm369
ER2B5400HighExcellentSoft359
ER3W5200HighExcellentFirm369
ER2.25500Very HighExcellentSoft369
ER3.25300Very HighExcellentFirm379
ER2.35600Very HighExcellentSoft379
ER3.35400Very HighExcellentFirm389
ER2CS5800Extremely HighExcellentSoft389
ER3CS5600Extremely HighExcellentFirm399

Tour Usage Comparison

ModelPGA Tour WinsPlayers Who Used ItMajor Wins
ER27Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor0
ER36Brandt Snedeker, Bryson DeChambeau, Charley Hoffman, D.A. Points, Graeme McDowell, Kevin Na0
ER2B7Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor0
ER3W6Brandt Snedeker, Bryson DeChambeau, Charley Hoffman, D.A. Points, Graeme McDowell, Kevin Na0
ER2.27Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor0
ER3.26Brandt Snedeker, Bryson DeChambeau, Charley Hoffman, D.A. Points, Graeme McDowell, Kevin Na0
ER2.37Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor0

Final Verdict:

Overall, the Evnroll ER2 and ER3 putters are both excellent choices for golfers looking to improve their putting game. While they have some differences, both putters have the Sweet Face Technology and milled face that can help you improve your accuracy and distance control. Your choice between the two putters depends on your personal preferences, budget, and playing style. If you prioritize a traditional look and feel and tend to hit the ball on the sweet spot, the ER2 may be the better choice. But if you want a more forgiving putter that can help you with off-center hits, the ER3 is worth considering.

Leave a Comment