Golf is a sport that requires a certain level of style and sophistication, and the right apparel can make a big difference in both comfort and performance. Two of the most popular golf apparel brands on the market today are Rhoback and Peter Millar. In this article, we’ll take a look at both brands and compare them in terms of style, quality, and price.
Rhoback
Rhoback is a relatively new player in the golf apparel market, but it has quickly gained a reputation for high-quality, stylish clothing. The brand offers a range of golf-specific products, including polos, shorts, pants, and outerwear, all designed to keep golfers comfortable and looking their best on the course. Rhoback’s products are known for their unique patterns and bright colors, which make them stand out from other golf apparel brands.
Peter Millar
Peter Millar is a well-established golf apparel brand that has been around for more than a decade. The brand is known for its classic, timeless designs, which appeal to golfers of all ages and skill levels. Peter Millar offers a range of golf apparel, including polos, pants, shorts, and outerwear, as well as accessories like hats and belts. The brand’s products are known for their high quality and attention to detail.
Style
When it comes to style, Rhoback and Peter Millar take different approaches. Rhoback is known for its bold, eye-catching patterns and colors, which appeal to golfers who want to make a statement on the course. Peter Millar, on the other hand, is known for its classic, understated designs, which appeal to golfers who prefer a more traditional look.
Quality
Both Rhoback and Peter Millar are known for their high-quality golf apparel. Rhoback uses performance fabrics like polyester and spandex to ensure that its products are comfortable and breathable, while Peter Millar uses materials like cotton and wool for a more classic look and feel. Both brands also pay close attention to details like stitching and buttons, ensuring that their products are durable and long-lasting.
Price
When it comes to price, Rhoback and Peter Millar are both on the higher end of the spectrum. Rhoback’s polos, for example, start at around $75, while Peter Millar’s polos start at around $90. While both brands offer high-quality products, the higher price point may not be accessible to all golfers.
Fit
Both Rhoback and Peter Millar offer a range of sizes and fits to accommodate different body types. Rhoback’s products tend to have a more athletic fit, which is designed to be close to the body without being too tight. Peter Millar’s products, on the other hand, tend to have a more traditional fit, which is roomier and more relaxed.
Functionality
When it comes to functionality, both Rhoback and Peter Millar offer products that are designed specifically for golf. For example, both brands offer polos with moisture-wicking technology, which helps to keep golfers cool and dry on the course. Rhoback also offers products with UPF sun protection, which is important for golfers who spend long hours in the sun.
Brand Recognition
While both Rhoback and Peter Millar are popular golf apparel brands, Peter Millar has a longer history and more established reputation in the market. This may be a factor for golfers who place a high value on brand recognition and prestige.
Customer Service
Another factor to consider when choosing between Rhoback and Peter Millar is customer service. Both brands offer a satisfaction guarantee, but Rhoback has a more generous return policy, allowing customers to return products for any reason within 90 days of purchase.
Golf Polos
Brand | Price | Material | Moisture-Wicking | Style |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $79 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | Bold Colors/Patterns |
Peter Millar | $98 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | Traditional/Solid Colors |
Golf Shorts
Brand | Price | Material | Stretch | Pockets |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $84 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | 4 |
Peter Millar | $115 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | 5 |
Golf Jackets
Brand | Price | Material | Waterproof | Style |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $145 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | Color-blocked |
Peter Millar | $225 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | Solid Colors |
Golf Pants
Brand | Price | Material | Stretch | Pockets |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $98 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | 5 |
Peter Millar | $135 | Polyester/Spandex | Yes | 4 |
Golf Accessories
Brand | Price | Product | Material | Features |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $39 | Golf Hat | Polyester/Spandex | Moisture-Wicking |
Peter Millar | $65 | Golf Belt | Leather | Interchangeable Buckles |
Golf Shoes
Brand | Price | Style | Material | Waterproof |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $139 | Spikeless | Synthetic Leather | Yes |
Peter Millar | $195 | Classic | Leather | Yes |
Golf Gloves
Brand | Price | Material | Grip | Size Options |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $24 | Synthetic Leather | Enhanced | S, M, L, XL |
Peter Millar | $39 | Cabretta Leather | Traditional | S, M, ML, L, XL |
Golf Bags
Brand | Price | Style | Material | Features |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $199 | Stand Bag | Nylon | 5-Way Top, 7 Pockets |
Peter Millar | $295 | Cart Bag | Nylon/Leather | 14-Way Top, 9 Pockets |
Golf Ball
Brand | Price | Construction | Spin | Compression |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | $34/dozen | 3-Piece | Low | 80 |
Peter Millar | $49/dozen | 4-Piece | High | 90 |
Golf Technology
Brand | Product | Price | Features | Compatibility |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rhoback | Golf GPS Watch | $149 | Preloaded Courses, Shot Tracking | iOS, Android |
Peter Millar | Golf Swing Analyzer | $199 | Real-Time Swing Metrics | iOS, Android |
Conclusion
Overall, Rhoback and Peter Millar are both excellent choices for golfers who want high-quality, stylish apparel. Rhoback’s bold patterns and colors will appeal to those who want to make a statement on the course, while Peter Millar’s classic designs will appeal to those who prefer a more traditional look. Both brands offer excellent quality, but their higher price point may not be accessible to all golfers. Ultimately, the choice between Rhoback and Peter Millar comes down to personal preference and budget.