In golf, “loft jacking” refers to the practice of designing golf clubheads with lower lofts (i.e., less vertical angle between the clubface and the shaft) than traditionally used in order to increase the distance of the ball flight. This technique has become increasingly popular in recent years, particularly with professional golfers, as it allows them to hit the ball farther and achieve greater distance off the tee.
How Loft Jacking Works
The principle behind loft jacking is simple: by reducing the loft angle of a clubhead, the golfer can achieve a lower ball flight that generates less spin, resulting in a greater carry distance and more roll upon landing. This is particularly useful for golfers who struggle with generating high ball speeds or who want to maximize their distance off the tee.
To achieve loft jacking, manufacturers typically design clubheads with a smaller profile and a lower center of gravity. This enables the golfer to strike the ball with a lower launch angle, which reduces spin and increases distance. Additionally, golfers who use clubs with lower lofts may be able to generate more ball speed due to the reduced spin, resulting in even greater distance gains.
Potential Drawbacks of Loft Jacking
While loft jacking can help golfers achieve greater distance, there are potential drawbacks to using clubs with lower lofts. For one, the reduced spin generated by lower-lofted clubs may make it more difficult to control the flight of the ball, particularly in windy conditions. Additionally, golfers who rely heavily on lofted shots around the green (such as pitches, chips, and bunker shots) may struggle with clubs that have lower lofts, as these shots require more loft to generate the necessary spin and control.
The History of Loft Jacking
Loft jacking is a relatively recent phenomenon in golf, having emerged in the early 2000s with the advent of new clubhead designs and materials. The term “loft jacking” itself was popularized by golf analyst and commentator Mark Crossfield, who used it to describe the trend of professional golfers using clubs with lower lofts to achieve greater distance.
The Impact of Loft Jacking on Golf Course Design
The use of clubs with lower lofts has had a significant impact on golf course design, particularly in terms of the lengthening of courses to accommodate the increased distance generated by modern equipment. Some courses have responded by adding new tee boxes, while others have been forced to redesign holes or add additional hazards to challenge golfers. The trend towards longer courses has also led to concerns about the environmental impact of maintaining larger areas of turf, as well as the potential impact on pace of play.
The Debate over Loft Jacking
The use of clubs with lower lofts has sparked debate within the golf community, with some arguing that it has fundamentally changed the nature of the game and made it less skill-based. Critics argue that golf has become a game of brute force, with little emphasis on finesse or shot-making ability. Others, however, argue that the evolution of equipment is a natural progression in any sport and that it has allowed golfers to reach new heights of performance.
The Role of Technology in Loft Jacking
Advancements in golf club technology have played a significant role in the development of loft jacking. The use of computer-aided design (CAD) and finite element analysis (FEA) allows manufacturers to create clubheads with optimized weight distribution, center of gravity, and other features that enable lower launch angles and greater distance. Materials such as titanium and carbon fiber also allow for stronger, lighter clubheads that can be designed with lower lofts while still maintaining stability and performance.
The Effect of Loft Jacking on the Golf Swing
The use of clubs with lower lofts can also have an impact on a golfer’s swing mechanics. Golfers who use clubs with lower lofts may need to adjust their swing to compensate for the reduced loft and increased distance. This can include changes to swing speed, angle of attack, and ball position at address. For some golfers, these adjustments may be minor, but for others, they may require significant changes to their swing mechanics.
The Ethics of Loft Jacking
The use of clubs with lower lofts has also raised questions about the ethics of loft jacking. Some argue that it gives an unfair advantage to those who can afford the latest equipment, while others argue that it is simply a natural progression in the evolution of the game. Golf’s governing bodies, including the USGA and R&A, have attempted to regulate equipment to prevent an arms race in loft jacking and maintain the integrity of the game.
Loft and Jacking Comparison for Popular Golf Clubs
| Club Model | Loft (degrees) | Jacked Loft (degrees) | Loft Increase (degrees) | Jacking Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TaylorMade SIM2 | 9 | 10.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Titleist TSi3 | 10 | 10.5 | 0.5 | Low |
| Callaway Epic Speed | 9 | 10.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Ping G425 LST | 10.5 | 11.5 | 1 | Moderate |
| Cobra RADSPEED | 9 | 10.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Mizuno ST-Z | 9.5 | 10.5 | 1 | Moderate |
| Honma TR21 X | 10 | 11 | 1 | Moderate |
| Srixon ZX7 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 1 | Moderate |
| Bridgestone Tour B JGR | 10.5 | 11.5 | 1 | Moderate |
| Wilson D9 | 9 | 10.5 | 1.5 | High |
Loft and Jacking Data for Irons
| Iron Model | Loft (degrees) | Jacked Loft (degrees) | Loft Increase (degrees) | Jacking Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titleist 718 AP1 | 21 | 22.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Callaway Apex CF19 | 24 | 24 | 0 | Low |
| TaylorMade P7MC | 34 | 35 | 1 | Moderate |
| Ping i210 | 30 | 31.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Mizuno MP-20 | 33 | 34 | 1 | Moderate |
| Srixon Z 585 | 25 | 26.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Wilson Staff D7 | 24 | 25.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Cobra King Forged CB/MB | 35 | 35 | 0 | Low |
| Bridgestone Tour B JGR HF1 | 22 | 23.5 | 1.5 | High |
| Honma T//World XP-1 | 22 | 23 | 1 | Moderate |
Jacking Effectiveness of Drivers for Different Handicaps
| Club Model | Handicap Level | Jacking Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| TaylorMade SIM2 | Low | High |
| Titleist TSi3 | Low | Low |
| Callaway Epic Speed | Mid | High |
| Ping G425 LST | Mid | Moderate |
| Cobra RADSPEED | High | High |
| Mizuno ST-Z | Low | Moderate |
| Honma TR21 X | High | Moderate |
| Srixon ZX7 | Mid | Moderate |
| Bridgestone Tour B JGR | High | Moderate |
| Wilson D9 | Mid | High |
Jacking Effectiveness of Irons for Different Handicaps
| Iron Model | Handicap Level | Jacking Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Titleist 718 AP1 | High | High |
| Callaway Apex CF19 | Mid | Low |
| TaylorMade P7MC | Low | Moderate |
| Ping i210 | Mid | High |
| Mizuno MP-20 | Low | Moderate |
Jacking Effectiveness of Drivers for Different Swing Speeds
| Club Model | Swing Speed (mph) | Jacking Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| TaylorMade SIM2 | <90 | Moderate |
| Titleist TSi3 | <90 | Low |
| Callaway Epic Speed | 90-105 | High |
| Ping G425 LST | 90-105 | Moderate |
| Cobra RADSPEED | >105 | High |
| Mizuno ST-Z | <90 | Low |
| Honma TR21 X | >105 | Moderate |
| Srixon ZX7 | 90-105 | Moderate |
| Bridgestone Tour B JGR | >105 | Moderate |
| Wilson D9 | 90-105 | High |
Conclusion
Loft jacking is a technique that has revolutionized the game of golf, allowing players to achieve greater distances than ever before. Advances in technology have played a significant role in the development of loft jacking, enabling manufacturers to create clubheads with optimized weight distribution, center of gravity, and other features that allow for lower lofts and greater distance. While there are potential drawbacks and ethical concerns associated with loft jacking, it is clear that it has had a significant impact on the game of golf and will continue to do so in the years to come.
