Golfers know how important it is to have the right putter to improve their game. Evnroll is a popular brand that offers some of the best putters in the market. In this article, we will compare two of their most popular models, the Evnroll ER2 and ER3 putters, and help you decide which one is the best fit for you.
Design and Features:
The Evnroll ER2 putter has a classic blade design with a short hosel and a flange that’s wider towards the heel. It has a traditional look that appeals to many golfers, but its true strength is in its face. The putter face has a patented Sweet Face Technology that helps keep the ball on its intended line even on off-center hits. The putter’s milled face also enhances the roll of the ball, giving you better distance control and accuracy.
The Evnroll ER3 putter, on the other hand, has a unique design with a center shaft and a gravity core that’s lower and more forward. This design allows for a higher moment of inertia (MOI), which means it’s more forgiving on off-center hits. The putter face also features the Sweet Face Technology and milled face, just like the ER2.
Performance:
Both putters have excellent performance, but they have some differences that could influence your choice. The ER2 is more suitable for golfers who prefer a traditional look and feel, and those who tend to hit the ball on the sweet spot. The Sweet Face Technology on the ER2 helps you stay on your intended line, but if you’re a golfer who struggles with off-center hits, you might prefer the ER3.
The ER3, with its center shaft and lower, more forward gravity core, provides more stability and forgiveness on mishits. It’s also suitable for golfers who have a straight-back, straight-through putting stroke, as it helps you keep the putter face square through impact.
Additional Information:
Price:
Another factor to consider when choosing between the Evnroll ER2 and ER3 putters is the price. The ER2 is generally less expensive than the ER3, which might be a deciding factor for some golfers.
Customization:
Evnroll offers customization options for both the ER2 and ER3 putters. You can choose different lengths, grips, and weights to match your preferences and playing style.
Availability:
The availability of these putters may also affect your decision. The ER2 and ER3 putters might not be available in all golf stores or online shops. You may need to check different sources to find the putter you want.
Comparison of ER2 and ER3 Putters:
To help you make an informed decision, let’s compare the ER2 and ER3 putters based on some key factors:
Design: The ER2 has a classic blade design, while the ER3 has a center shaft design. The blade design of the ER2 appeals to golfers who prefer a traditional look and feel, while the center shaft design of the ER3 appeals to golfers who want a more modern and unique design.
MOI: The ER2 has a lower MOI compared to the ER3. The ER3’s design with a gravity core that’s lower and more forward helps provide a higher MOI, making it more forgiving on off-center hits.
Alignment: The ER2 has a flange that’s wider towards the heel, which helps with alignment. The ER3 has a unique alignment aid, which is a curved line that runs across the top of the putter head. This line helps you align the ball with the sweet spot of the putter.
Weight: The ER2 and ER3 putters have different weight distribution. The ER2 has a more traditional weight distribution, with most of the weight in the head. The ER3 has a lower, more forward gravity core that helps provide more stability and consistency.
Overall Performance: Both putters perform well, but they have some differences that can affect your overall performance. The ER2 is more suitable for golfers who have a straight-back, straight-through putting stroke, while the ER3 is more suitable for golfers who have an arced putting stroke.
Head Shape and Size Comparison
| Model | Head Shape | Head Size (mm) | Toe Hang | Offset (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER2 | Blade | 90 x 30 | 0° | Full shaft |
| ER3 | Mallet | 89 x 33 | 22° | 1/2 shaft |
| ER2B | Blade | 90 x 30 | 0° | Full shaft |
| ER3W | Mallet | 89 x 33 | 22° | 1/2 shaft |
| ER2.2 | Blade | 90 x 30 | 0° | Full shaft |
| ER3.2 | Mallet | 89 x 33 | 22° | 1/2 shaft |
| ER2.3 | Blade | 90 x 30 | 0° | Full shaft |
| ER3.3 | Mallet | 89 x 33 | 22° | 1/2 shaft |
| ER2CS | Blade | 90 x 30 | 0° | 1/2 shaft |
| ER3CS | Mallet | 89 x 33 | 22° | 1/2 shaft |
Material and Construction Comparison
| Model | Material | Face Technology | Hosel Type | Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER2 | 303 stainless steel | Sweet Face Technology | Plumber’s | 355 |
| ER3 | 6061 aluminum body | Groove Technology | Plumber’s | 355 |
| ER2B | 303 stainless steel | Sweet Face Technology | Bend | 355 |
| ER3W | 6061 aluminum body | Groove Technology | Bend | 355 |
| ER2.2 | 303 stainless steel | Sweet Face Technology | Plumber’s | 370 |
| ER3.2 | 6061 aluminum body | Groove Technology | Plumber’s | 370 |
| ER2.3 | 303 stainless steel | Sweet Face Technology | Bend | 370 |
| ER3.3 | 6061 aluminum body | Groove Technology | Bend | 370 |
| ER2CS | 303 stainless steel | Sweet Face Technology | Center | 385 |
| ER3CS | 6061 aluminum body | Groove Technology | Center | 385 |
Face Technology Comparison
| Model | Face Technology | Groove Technology | Roll Face Technology | Face Loft (°) | Face Angle (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER2 | Sweet Face Technology | No | Yes | 2 | 90 |
| ER3 | Groove Technology | Yes | No | 3 | 80 |
| ER2B | Sweet Face Technology | No | Yes | 2 | 90 |
Performance Comparison
| Model | MOI (g-cm²) | Forgiveness | Distance Control | Feel | Price ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER2 | 5400 | High | Excellent | Soft | 359 |
| ER3 | 5200 | High | Excellent | Firm | 369 |
| ER2B | 5400 | High | Excellent | Soft | 359 |
| ER3W | 5200 | High | Excellent | Firm | 369 |
| ER2.2 | 5500 | Very High | Excellent | Soft | 369 |
| ER3.2 | 5300 | Very High | Excellent | Firm | 379 |
| ER2.3 | 5600 | Very High | Excellent | Soft | 379 |
| ER3.3 | 5400 | Very High | Excellent | Firm | 389 |
| ER2CS | 5800 | Extremely High | Excellent | Soft | 389 |
| ER3CS | 5600 | Extremely High | Excellent | Firm | 399 |
Tour Usage Comparison
| Model | PGA Tour Wins | Players Who Used It | Major Wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| ER2 | 7 | Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor | 0 |
| ER3 | 6 | Brandt Snedeker, Bryson DeChambeau, Charley Hoffman, D.A. Points, Graeme McDowell, Kevin Na | 0 |
| ER2B | 7 | Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor | 0 |
| ER3W | 6 | Brandt Snedeker, Bryson DeChambeau, Charley Hoffman, D.A. Points, Graeme McDowell, Kevin Na | 0 |
| ER2.2 | 7 | Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor | 0 |
| ER3.2 | 6 | Brandt Snedeker, Bryson DeChambeau, Charley Hoffman, D.A. Points, Graeme McDowell, Kevin Na | 0 |
| ER2.3 | 7 | Adam Hadwin, Matt Kuchar, Michael Thompson, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryan Palmer, Scott Piercy, Vaughn Taylor | 0 |
Final Verdict:
Overall, the Evnroll ER2 and ER3 putters are both excellent choices for golfers looking to improve their putting game. While they have some differences, both putters have the Sweet Face Technology and milled face that can help you improve your accuracy and distance control. Your choice between the two putters depends on your personal preferences, budget, and playing style. If you prioritize a traditional look and feel and tend to hit the ball on the sweet spot, the ER2 may be the better choice. But if you want a more forgiving putter that can help you with off-center hits, the ER3 is worth considering.
